Four individuals—two currently serving members of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), one former CAF member, and one former Air Cadets instructor—have been arrested and charged in relation to an ideologically motivated violent extremism (IMVE) plot targeting land near Québec City.
In March 2023, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), in coordination with INSET (Integrated National Security Enforcement Team), initiated a national security investigation into suspected paramilitary activity, extremist recruitment, and ideological radicalization occurring in the Québec City region. The probe was triggered by intelligence indicating that active-duty Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) members were involved in unsanctioned training operations, recruitment activities, and discussions centered on the violent overthrow of governmental authority.
The RCMP seized a significant cache of weapons and military-grade equipment from multiple locations in the Québec City area. The recovered materials included 83 firearms, some of which were prohibited, 16 explosive devices, approximately 11,000 rounds of ammunition, 130 high-capacity magazines, four night vision goggles, and various pieces of tactical gear and military uniforms. Investigators also identified stolen or misappropriated items linked to Department of National Defence inventories, with indications that some material originated from Canadian Forces Base Petawawa. Visual evidence obtained through social media monitoring and physical surveillance confirmed the suspects’ involvement in live-fire drills, ambush training, and organized paramilitary exercises.
Initial leads emerged from online surveillance of encrypted messaging platforms and a private Instagram account that showcased individuals in military gear participating in shooting drills and ambush training. This social media channel, managed by one of the accused, served both as a recruitment vector and as a propaganda dissemination platform for anti-government narratives.
Charged Individuals
The suspects were engaged in paramilitary training, weapons stockpiling, and online recruitment, with the stated objective of establishing an anti-government militia and seizing territory to form a separatist enclave. This marks the first instance in Canadian history where serving military personnel have been charged under terrorism statutes. They face multiple criminal charges, including facilitating terrorist activity, possession and transfer of prohibited firearms and explosives, and violations of the Defence Production Act for the illegal possession of controlled military equipment. Additional charges include unlawful storage of firearms, possession of large quantities of ammunition, and possession of explosive devices.
The four individuals arrested in July 2025 are Cpl. Marc-Aurèle Chabot (24), an active-duty member of the Canadian Armed Forces stationed at CFB Valcartier. Chabot is identified as a core organizer and tactical trainer who participated in weapons acquisition and appeared in recruitment materials. Also arrested was Cpl. Matthew Forbes (33), another active-duty CAF member based at the same installation, charged with possession of explosives and prohibited devices, including violations under the Defence Production Act for unauthorized possession of controlled military equipment; he is believed to have facilitated access to military-grade gear. Raphaël Lagacé (25), a former CAF member, served as a field training participant and social media propagandist, involved in recruitment and coordination via encrypted communications. The fourth suspect, Simon Angers-Audet (24), is a former civilian instructor with the Royal Canadian Air Cadets who played a logistical and communications role, helping organize off-grid training exercises across Québec and Ontario and reportedly assisting in procuring equipment through civilian supply networks.
Ideological Alignment & Methodology
The group’s ideological orientation aligns with Ideologically Motivated Violent Extremism (IMVE), as defined by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and Public Safety Canada. Specifically, the group’s positioning falls under the anti-authority and grievance-driven subcategories, two of the four officially recognized branches of IMVE, which also include xenophobic and gender-driven violence.
Their anti-government and anti-authority stance is rooted in a belief that the Canadian state is illegitimate, corrupt, or oppressive, and that violent resistance is a justified means of reclaiming sovereignty or establishing an alternative social order. This rhetoric frequently overlaps with themes such as hostility toward law enforcement, rejection of federal jurisdiction, and resistance to perceived globalist or liberal agendas.
Motivational drivers behind the group’s radicalization appear to be multi-layered and internally inconsistent, which is typical of contemporary IMVE formations. These include:
- Anti-statist narratives, portraying the government as an occupying or illegitimate force
- Personal and collective grievance, particularly in response to COVID-era restrictions, perceived loss of freedoms, and distrust in institutional authority
- Cultural pessimism and nihilism, including the belief that Canadian society is in irreversible decline
- Indicators of white nationalist affinity, although not explicitly stated, inferred from tactical imagery, isolationist language, and online behavior patterns
The group’s recruitment strategy, centered around a private Instagram account, suggests they were actively emulating operational and symbolic elements of U.S.-based militia organizations, notably The Base, Boogaloo movement, and the Three Percenters. This included the use of military-style uniforms, decentralization of training cells, glorification of paramilitary exercises, and the promotion of apocalyptic or accelerationist themes. These features reflect a growing transnational convergence of far-right tactical subcultures, in which aesthetics, training doctrine, and ideological talking points are easily disseminated across platforms and borders.
The online propaganda circulated by the group also demonstrates a shift from rigid ideological doctrine toward a more chaotic and nihilistic posture, where violence itself becomes a legitimizing act, and where ideology is assembled post hoc from a blend of conspiracy theories, nationalist slogans, and survivalist rhetoric. This fluidity makes the group more difficult to classify and disrupt, as their structure and motives do not follow traditional hierarchical or political models.
The ideological profile of the Québec cell reflects a modern hybrid threat, decentralized, digitally native, militarily trained, and ideologically unstable, operating within a rapidly evolving ecosystem of online radicalization and paramilitary emulation.
Recruitment and Propaganda
One of the accused operated a private Instagram account that served as the group’s central platform for recruitment and propaganda. The account was used to disseminate paramilitary imagery, share logistical information for upcoming training sessions, and cultivate a sense of exclusivity and ideological belonging among followers. It promoted firearms training, survival exercises, and anti-government narratives, effectively blending aesthetics from U.S.-style militia propaganda with local grievances. The content often featured individuals in military fatigues conducting live-fire drills, accompanied by cryptic captions alluding to sovereignty, resistance, and distrust of the state. The account specifically targeted individuals with firearms experience, military backgrounds, or pre-existing anti-authority sentiments, aiming to radicalize and recruit those most capable of contributing to armed operations. Recruitment posts were typically framed as invitations to “train for resilience” or “prepare for what’s coming,” using language that signaled insider status while avoiding explicit incitement. This strategy reflects a broader trend in IMVE cells, where social media is used not just for outreach, but as an ideological filter, identifying potential recruits based on their engagement with curated extremist content.
Tactics
The Québec cell employed a decentralized operational structure, allowing members to function independently across various regions while maintaining coordination through encrypted communications and private social media platforms. This non-hierarchical format is typical of modern IMVE groups, designed to reduce exposure and limit disruption if one part of the network is compromised. The group leveraged resources and training gained through service in the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF), including access to tactical knowledge, weapons handling, and field navigation techniques. Members conducted scouting missions to identify rural areas suitable for land seizure, with the stated intent of establishing an autonomous stronghold outside government jurisdiction. Their internal organization reflected clear operational compartmentalization, with distinct separation between logistics, recruitment, and direct action roles. This structure increased operational security and allowed the group to isolate radicalized combatants from lower-risk support personnel.
Institutional Vulnerabilities
The case exposes significant shortcomings in the CAF’s internal mechanisms for detecting and disrupting extremist activity. The suspects were able to acquire, transport, and store military-grade equipment, including firearms, explosives, and night-vision optics, without triggering internal alarms. There was a systemic failure in monitoring digital footprints—despite extended online propaganda activity and visible coordination of training exercises, no flags were raised within the chain of command. Moreover, no internal counter-intelligence measures appear to have intercepted the growing radicalization of these individuals, even as their actions escalated from ideological rhetoric to paramilitary preparation. These failures point to a critical need for enhanced vetting procedures, active surveillance of personnel involved in high-risk postings, and stronger cooperation between CAF leadership and federal intelligence agencies.
This is not the first instance of extremist activity linked to Canada’s military. In 2020, Patrik Mathews, a former army reservist from Manitoba, was arrested in the United States for his role in The Base, a white supremacist group plotting to incite a race war. That same year, Corey Hurren, an active-duty CAF member, drove a truck through the gates of Rideau Hall armed with multiple firearms in an attempted armed confrontation with then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. In 2006, Steven Chand, a former soldier, was convicted as part of the Toronto 18 group, which plotted al-Qaeda-inspired attacks on Canadian targets.
What distinguishes the Québec case is its combination of active-duty personnel, operational maturity, and the scale of the weapons cache. The group’s level of tactical planning, geographic mobility, and operational maturity represent a heightened threat profile not previously observed in Canadian IMVE cases, underscoring the need for a strategic overhaul in how extremist infiltration is identified and countered within national defense institutions.
Strategic Implications
The scope and sophistication of this operation carry significant strategic implications for Canadian national security. First, the volume of weapons and level of tactical preparation strongly indicate that the group had moved beyond ideological planning and was entering a pre-operational or execution phase. The seizure of explosives, firearms, and reconnaissance data suggests a high degree of intent and capability.
Second, the group’s recruitment strategy, centered around social media, specifically targeted youth and individuals with prior firearms experience. This raises the risk of civilian radicalization, particularly among disaffected or ideologically curious populations, including veterans, cadets, and gun hobbyist circles.
Third, the incident poses a serious threat to the integrity of the Canadian Armed Forces. The involvement of active-duty personnel undermines public trust in military institutions and raises concerns about the robustness of recruitment, screening, and internal counter-extremism mechanisms. It also risks damaging Canada’s international defense partnerships by casting doubt on force reliability and discipline.
Finally, there is a potential foreign influence risk. The group’s tactics, language, and training models closely resemble those of known U.S.-based militia organizations. Ongoing investigations will seek to determine whether the Québec cell maintained ideological, logistical, or financial ties to cross-border extremist networks or transnational accelerationist movements.
What’s next?
To address the evolving threat of ideologically motivated violent extremism within or adjacent to Canada’s national defense infrastructure, several measures are recommended. A comprehensive CAF internal audit should be conducted at Canadian Forces Base Valcartier and CFB Petawawa, focusing on inventory control, personnel security clearances, and reporting mechanisms to identify weaknesses in materiel tracking and prevent unauthorized access to sensitive equipment.
A legislative review is also necessary to evaluate whether current laws provide sufficient authority for the CAF to detect and address extremist behavior within its ranks and to enhance data-sharing protocols with CSIS and the RCMP. In the digital domain, stronger social media takedown protocols must be implemented through improved coordination between federal agencies and major platforms such as Meta, X, and Telegram, ensuring rapid removal of IMVE-related accounts and propaganda. A focused civilian outreach strategy should be launched to counter radicalization efforts targeting firearms communities and at-risk youth, leveraging partnerships with community organizations, shooting ranges, and online forums.
Finally, a Joint Task Force review should assess the structure and resourcing of the Integrated National Security Enforcement Team (INSET) to enhance interagency coordination, particularly in operations involving military-linked threats.
This case marks a serious shift in Canada’s security landscape, but also extends beyond Canada as similar militaries especially in Europe face similar shortfalls. The fact that active-duty soldiers were involved shows significant lapses on how the military tracks and responds to radicalization. While the legal process plays out, continued monitoring of connected transnational networks is essential. Preventing future threats will require more than arrests, iit demands stronger oversight, better intelligence sharing, and institutional change focused on combating domestic nihilist and rightwing radicalization and threats.
- Humphreys, Adrian. “Canadian Soldiers Charged in Alleged Anti-Government Terror Plot.” National Post, July 8, 2025. https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/canadian-soldiers-charged-in-alleged-anti-government-terror-plot.
- Yousif, Nadine. “Canadian Armed Forces Members Plotted ‘Anti-Government Militia’, Police Say.” BBC News, July 8, 2025. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68998846.
- Austen, Ian. “Four Charged in Extremist Plot to Seize Land Near Quebec City.” The New York Times, July 8, 2025. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/08/world/canada/terrorist-plot-charges-canada-quebec.html#:~:text=The%20men%20charged%20with%20terrorism,the%20explosives%20and%20weapons%20offenses..
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police. “RCMP Charge Four Individuals for Terrorism-Related Offences in Quebec.” News Release. RCMP-GRC.gc.ca, July 8, 2025. https://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/en/news/2025/rcmp-charge-four-individuals-terrorism-related-offences-quebec.
- Public Safety Canada. “Ideologically Motivated Violent Extremism.” Government of Canada, accessed July 9, 2025. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/tls/index-en.aspx.
- Canadian Security Intelligence Service. 2024 Public Report. Ottawa: Government of Canada, 2024. https://www.canada.ca/en/security-intelligence-service/corporate/publications/2024-public-report.html.
- Centre for International Governance Innovation. “Expert Commentary: Wesley Wark on Domestic Extremist Threats.” CIGI, July 2025. https://www.cigionline.org/articles/extremism-canada-military.
- Insight Threat Intelligence. Davis, Jessica. “Analysis of Domestic IMVE Case Involving CAF Members.” July 2025. https://www.insightthreatintel.com/imve-caf-2025-analysis.